RegaladoMullins382
From GunGame5 Documentation
It is widely believed that a lot of for us live in our own homes. However, a lot of people are tenants renting homes from private landlords, councils and housing associations. At the heart of landlord and tenant law is the tension between two conflicting interests; those of tenants and the wonderful of landlords.
Housing law attempts to help strike a balance between allowing property owners to make profits from them properties, and providing tenants using affordable housing. On the main hand, landlords need to make profits in order to maintain their properties on the standards set out by the law. On the many other hand, tenants require housing that is both decent and inexpensive.
The other important issue is security of stint. Again, the law attempts to strike a stabilize between how easily landlords are able to repossess their properties, and the amount security tenants have on their homes. If landlords are to invest in residential property to raise the supply of housing, then they have to be confident of being able to remove their tenants in order to sell their assets. Without this right their properties would lose high of their value. Tenants obviously want the right to stay as long as possible, as moving property is both expensive and time-consuming.
Landlords feel that casing law favours tenants for many reasons. Firstly, landlords have to maintain their properties to high standards set out by the government, even though tenants do not pay for the rent. Secondly, if tenants breach their tenancy and also the landlord is forced to evict them, the courts will normally only award a small percentage of the landlord's legal costs with repossessing property. Thirdly, if tenants don't want to leave a property, landlords have to go through a lengthy legal process that usually takes between 4 and 6 months to successfully evict tenants.
Landlords feel that regulations is especially biased towards tenants when it comes to repossessing property. To be successful in obtaining a possession order to get a property, a valid notice could be the starting point. The notice will be scrutinised by a judge along with the tenants' legal representatives, who ? re typically specialist housing lawyers. Notices are given away freely by many organisations and appearance simple to complete. Nevertheless, this is not the situation, and landlords frequently generate mistakes costing them a few months of delay.
Landlords should also don't forget that there are many options for tenants to defend themselves at no cost through government-sponsored lawyers. Each time a defence is filed the legal costs to the landlord escalate as even more hearing dates are set. Tenants often benefit with free solicitors, while landlords don't. Therefore it is vital that landlords obtain professional advice with a property solicitor first, so that they don't end up being involved in expensive to defend cases that could have easily been avoided.
It can also be argued that housing regulation does favour tenants. However, landlords rent property out to make profits. Therefore like any other business decision process, jointly include the additional expenses that the law imposes on them within their business plans, before investing in residential property.
